SHARM EL SHEIKH, Egypt, Nov 24 (IPS) – COP 27 was each higher and worse than anticipated, say Prof. Felix Dodds and Chris SpenceIt’s lastly over. After the anticipation and build-up to COP27, the most important local weather assembly of the yr is now in our rear-view mirror. The crowds of delegates that thronged the Sharm el-Sheikh worldwide conference middle for 2 lengthy weeks have all headed residence to recuperate. Many might be fatigued from lengthy hours and sleepless nights as negotiators tried to seal a deal that might transfer the world forwards. Did all this difficult work repay? In our opinion, COP 27 was each higher and worse than we’d hoped.
Failing to Comply with the Science
First, the dangerous information. COP 27 didn’t ship what the science tells us was wanted. With the window of alternative closing quick on our aim of limiting world temperature rise to 1.5C or much less, COP 27 did far too little on the all-important problem of mitigation—that’s, chopping emissions.
The case for pressing motion retains getting stronger. The most recent experiences from the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC) make for grim studying about what to anticipate if we let temperatures rise an excessive amount of. These days, although, we simply must learn the newspapers to catch a glimpse of the longer term.
The pinnacle of the important thing negotiating Group of 77 – 134 growing international locations – was Pakistan which has been coping with the worst floods in its historical past, leaving 1717 folks lifeless and dealing an estimated $US40 billion in injury. In 2022 within the USA, there have been 15 climate-related disasters which every exceeded $1 billion in prices.
In the meantime, in Africa, in line with Carbon Transient’s evaluation of catastrophe information, “excessive climate occasions have killed no less than 4,000 folks and affected an extra 19 million for the reason that begin of 2022.”
Since this COP was billed by some because the “Africa COP”, one might count on a powerful response to such information.
The stress was subsequently on at COP 27 to reply to such disasters. Attending COP27 had been 112 world leaders and over 300 authorities ministers: not as many as at COP 26, however nonetheless a great quantity. One thing like 27,000 folks from governments, intergovernmental, stakeholders, and journalists additionally attended the COP. This was to the backdrop of the UN Secretary Common warning us that we would have liked to “cooperate or perish,” to take pressing motion to take us off “a freeway to local weather hell”.
Messing up on mitigation: And but progress on mitigation was modest, at finest. Whereas some delegations pushed exhausting for stronger commitments on chopping emissions, the urge for food in some quarters simply didn’t appear to be there. After being pressured to do extra in Paris and Glasgow, China, India, and a few of the oil-producing international locations appeared reluctant to take way more in Sharm el-Sheikh.
They really feel developed international locations, that are traditionally chargeable for the majority of emissions, must be doing extra themselves, fairly than coercing others. The consequence was a negotiated end result with little extra on the desk than we had in Glasgow. As an example, delegates couldn’t comply with ramp up their language on fossil fuels, a lot to many individuals’s disappointment.
Finance: Likewise, there was not an excessive amount of to report on the problem of local weather finance. The $US100 billion annual help for growing international locations initially promoted by Hilary Clinton on the 2009 Copenhagen COP and enshrined within the Paris COP in 2015 might be reviewed in 2024 with a brand new determine being hopefully agreed then for 2025 implementation.
The International South has been speaking of this new sum numbering within the trillions to assist adapt and mitigate towards local weather change. And but there have been few indicators of motion in direction of something of that magnitude.
On condition that the North has nonetheless not met its pledge of US$100 billion by 2020, it’s clear a whole lot of motion is required within the subsequent couple of years. But information from exterior the convention, such because the US Home of Representatives now having a Republican majority, doesn’t bode nicely.
For a gathering billed because the “implementation COP” the place local weather motion was taken to a different degree, the information on mitigation and finance was subsequently disappointing.
Simply previous to the beginning of COP27 the lead negotiator for Egypt Mohamed Nasr underscored: “science experiences had been telling us that sure, planning is less than expectations, however it was implementation on the bottom that was actually lagging behind.”
Exceeding Expectations—the Loss and Injury Fund
There have been some vivid spots, nonetheless.
Maybe most shocking was the settlement to create a ‘Loss and Injury’ fund to assist essentially the most susceptible international locations. This has been a key problem for nearly 30 years, significantly for small island growing international locations.
In Glasgow this appeared not possible to be resolved within the Sharm COP, however with a late change of coronary heart by the Europeans and ultimately by the USA and others within the OECD, that is maybe essentially the most important and shocking end result from COP 27. Whilst just lately as October, the indicators had been that OECD international locations weren’t on board with requires a brand new fund. Nevertheless, at COP 27 the “trickle” of earlier motion on this space became a flood.
Curiously, it was Scotland at COP 26 that began issues off, with a modest, voluntary contribution. Extra just lately, Denmark, Austria, New Zealand and Belgium had additionally monetary commitments to loss and injury, now amounting to $US244.5 million. Mia Mottley Barbados’ Prime Minister has known as for a ten% windfall tax on oil corporations to fund loss and injury attributable to local weather change, which might elevate round $US31 billion if it had been launched for 2022. Nonetheless, the indicators a fund could be agreed at COP 27 had not been good.
This makes the ultimate end result all of the extra welcome. The concept, the door is now open for essentially the most susceptible international locations to obtain extra help. A aim has now been set to totally operationalize the fund at COP 28 in a yr’s time. For essentially the most susceptible nations, this can not come shortly sufficient.
International Aim on Adaptation: One other optimistic improvement, albeit on a extra modest scale, was within the space of the ‘International Aim on Adaptation’. Right here, delegates agreed to “provoke the event of a framework” to be obtainable for adoption subsequent yr.
Plenty of work will should be accomplished on the intersessional assembly of the UN Local weather Conference’s subsidiary our bodies in Bonn in June subsequent yr to organize for this, together with tips on how to measure progress in direction of this Aim. An method just like the event of the Sustainable Improvement Targets in 2015 may be acceptable, maybe?
Article 6: One other of the Glasgow breakthroughs was that on Article 6 of the Paris Settlement on carbon markets and worldwide cooperation. COP 27 noticed some stable work undertaken on tips on how to operationalize this each in market and non-market approaches.
There are nonetheless a whole lot of sceptics on this may have a real impression and the way to make sure not double counting and even that any offsets are actual. An method that’s extra ecosystem-based than simply bushes is gaining momentum. Such a change, if it occurs, additionally provides an actual probability to hyperlink the 2 main UN conventions on local weather and biodiversity.
Agriculture: The work on the Koronivia Work Programme on Agriculture went all the way down to the wire. The end result was a four-year open-ended working group reporting at COP31 (2026). Some controversy on the time period ‘meals methods’ may even see its first workshop deal with this problem.
It can additionally take a look at how we will higher combine the programme’s work into different constituted our bodies such because the monetary mechanisms of the conference. The Inexperienced Local weather Fund has given solely $US1.1 billion for adaptation on agriculture. It says one of many main causes for that is the:
“Lack of built-in agricultural improvement planning and capacities that think about maladaptation dangers and funding wants throughout the agricultural sector, local weather info companies and provide chains.”
Whereas these outcomes on agriculture, adaptation and Article 6 could appear modest, they need to be welcomed as steps in the precise course.
Coalitions of the Keen: One of many outcomes from the Glasgow COP was the launch of ‘Coalitions of the Keen’; teams of nations and stakeholders wanting to maneuver faster on a difficulty than they may beneath the official UN negotiations, that are consensus-driven and contain greater than 190 international locations. In Sharm el-Sheikh we noticed a lot of international locations be part of the Methane Pledge, together with Australia and Egypt. China joined the assembly on the Pledge and dedicated to its personal nationwide methane technique.
In Glasgow, 137 international locations had taken a landmark step ahead by committing to halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by 2030. With the approaching return to management in Brazil of President-elect Lula da Silva, there’s renewed hope that actual motion on the Amazon forests is feasible once more. Lula dedicated Brazil to reaching zero deforestation and was hailed as a hero by many when he turned up at COP 27 throughout the second week.
In the meantime, the Glasgow Monetary Alliance for Internet Zero (GFANZ)—the worldwide coalition of main monetary establishments—dedicated to accelerating the decarbonization of the economic system. GFANZ, which incorporates over 550 of the world’s main monetary establishments, has dedicated to scale back their financed emissions in step with 1.5 levels C.
With $US150 trillion of mixed steadiness sheets, the accountability mechanism introduced of a brand new Internet-Zero Information Public Utility is but to show whether it is efficient in holding the finance sector to their commitments. Nevertheless, if it may possibly ship on its potential, this might be a recreation changer.
There was a lot extra exercise at COP 27 the place the outcomes are more durable to measure. Most individuals at these giant UN local weather summits usually are not negotiators and COP 27 was filled with “aspect occasions” and authorities and stakeholder pavilions every with its personal set of occasions and agendas.
Nation pavilions offered a venue to speak about their challenges, problem pavilions on oceans, meals, water, well being, schooling, and resilience highlighted their points and the way they match into the local weather agenda. These allow essential points to be mentioned in a extra open approach than might be undertaken in negotiations.
Concepts had been shared, connections made, and partnerships for additional motion shared. The upshot of all of this exercise is difficult to measure, however in all probability appreciable. The thematic days organized by the Egyptian Presidency additionally gave house to those points and helped convey collectively concepts that will finally discover their approach into future UN choices. On this respect, too, the standard of the aspect occasions and pavilions at COP 27 exceeded our expectations.
On to Dubai and COP28
Was COP27 successful or failure? With regards to maintaining with the science, the reply can hardly be optimistic. The decision to “hold 1.5 alive” hangs within the steadiness and continues to be on “life help”. In that sense, COP 27 had little or no impression on our present trajectory, which is a probable warming of two.4-2.8 C by the top of the century.
However, the promise of a loss and injury fund, in addition to modest successes on adaptation, Article 6, agriculture, and actions exterior the official negotiations, imply COP 27 delivered some vivid spots of success.
Looking forward to subsequent yr, COP 28 might be vital because it marks the primary “world stocktake” to evaluate the place issues now stand. We hope this may focus world leaders to extend their pledges (or “nationally decided contributions”) considerably. It will likely be attention-grabbing to see how the United Arab Emirates, as COP 28 host, performs. As a serious oil producer, it faces some critical challenges in transitioning to a web zero world.
At COP 27, there have been rumours the UAE was ramping up its workforce and bringing in extra exterior experience forward of subsequent yr. That is definitely a great signal if COP 28 is to ship the type of groundbreaking outcomes the science now calls for.
Felix Dodds and Chris Spence are co-editors of the brand new e book, Heroes of Environmental Diplomacy: Profiles in Braveness (Routledge Press, 2022). It consists of chapters on the local weather negotiations held in Kyoto (1997), Copenhagen (2009) and Paris (2015).
© Inter Press Service (2022) — All Rights ReservedUnique supply: Inter Press Service